Jayaprakash Narayan (11 October 1902 –
8 October 1979), popularly referred to as JP or Lok
Nayak (Hindi for The People's Hero), was an
Indian independence activist, social reformer and political leader, remembered
especially for leading the mid-1970s opposition against Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, for
whose overthrow he called a "total revolution".
His biography,Jayaprakash, was
written by his nationalist friend and an eminent writer of Hindi literature,Ramavriksha
Benipuri. In 1999, he was posthumously awarded the Bharat Ratna, India 's highest
civilian award, in recognition of his social work. Other awards include the Magsaysay award for Public Service in
1965. The Patna airport is also named after
him. The largest hospital run by the Delhi
government and the teaching hospital of the famous Maulana
Azad Medical
College , Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Hospital ,
is also named after him. It was formerly called Irwin hospital. There is also a
park in his name, situated on Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, in New
Delhi , just opposite to Maulana
Azad Medical
College . "After
exhausting the courses at the Vidyapeeth, Jayaprakash decided to continue
studies in the United States ."[5] At age 20, Jayaprakash
sailed aboard the cargo ship Jayaprakash
reached California on 8 October 1922 and was
admitted toBerkeley in January 1923. To
pay for his education, Jayaprakash picked grapes, set them out to dry, packed
fruits at a canning factory, washed dishes, worked as a mechanic at a garage
and at a slaughter house, sold lotions and taught.[citation needed] All these jobs gave
Jayaprakash an insight into the difficulties of the working class. Jayaprakash
was forced to transfer to The University of Iowa when fees at Berkeley were doubled. He
was forced to transfer to many universities thereafter. He pursued his
favourite subject, sociology, and received much help from ProfessorEdward
Ross, the father of sociology. In Wisconsin , Jayaprakash was introduced to Karl
Marx's Das Kapital. News of the success of the
Russian revolution of 1917 made Jayaprakash conclude that Marxism was the way
to alleviate the suffering of the masses. He delved into books by Indian
intellectual and Communist theoretician M. N.
Roy. His paper on sociology, "Social Variation", was
declared the best of the yearNarayan returned from the US
to India
in late 1929 as a Marxist.[7] He joined the Indian National
Congress on the
invitation of Jawaharlal Nehru in 1929; Mahatma Gandhi became his mentor in the Congress. He
shared a house at Kadam Kuan in Patna with his close friend and nationalist Ganga Sharan Sinha.[8] with whom he shared the most cordial and lasting
friendship.[8]
During the Indian
independence movement he
was arrested, jailed, and tortured several times by the British.[citation needed] He won particular fame during the Quit India movement.[citation needed]
After being jailed in 1932 for civil disobedience against British rule, Narayan was
imprisoned in NasikJail,
where he met Ram Manohar Lohia, Minoo Masani, Achyut Patwardhan, Ashok Mehta, Yusuf
Desai and other
national leaders. After his release, the Congress Socialist
Party, or (CSP), a left-wing group within the Congress, was formed
with Acharya Narendra Deva as President and Narayan as General
secretary.[citatiWhen Mahatma
Gandhi launched
the Quit India Movement in August 1942, Yogendra
Shukla scaled
the wall of Hazaribagh Central Jail along with Jayaprakash Narayan, Suraj
Narayan Singh, Gulab Chand Gupta, Ramnandan Mishra, Shaligram Singh and Shyam
Barthwar, with a goal to start an underground movement for freedom.[9] As Jayaprakash Narayan
was ill, Yogendra
Shukla walked
to Gaya with Jayaprakash
Narayan on his shoulders,[9] a distance of about
124 kilometres.[10] Narayan returned to
prominence in State politics in the late 1960s. 1974 ushered in a year of high
inflation, unemployment and lack of supplies and essential commodities. Nav
Nirman Andolan
movement of Gujarat asked Jayaprakash to lead
a peaceful agitation. On 8 April 1974, aged 72, he led a silent procession at Patna . The procession was
lathi charged. On 5 June 1974, Jayaprakash addressed a large crowd at Gandhi
Maidan in Patna .
He declared, "This is a revolution, friends! We are not here merely to see
the Vidhan Sabha dissolved. That is only one milestone on our journey. But we
have a long way to go... After 27 years of freedom, people of this country are
wracked by hunger, rising prices, corruption... oppressed by every kind of
injustice... it is a Total Revolution we want, nothing less!" In 1974, he
led the students' movement in the state of Bihar
which gradually developed into a popular people's movement known as the Bihar
Movement. It was during this movement that JP gave a call for
peaceful Total Revolution. Together with V. M.
Tarkunde, he found the Citizens for Democracy in 1974 and the People's Union for Civil
Liberties in
1976, both NGOs, to uphold and defend civil liberties. Indira Gandhi was found guilty of violating
electoral laws by the Allahabad High Court.
Narayan called for Indira and the CMs to resign and the military and police to
disregard unconstitutional and immoral orders. He advocated a program of social
transformation which he termedSampoorna kraanti, "total
revolution". Immediately afterwords, Gandhi proclaimed a national Emergency on
the midnight of 25 June 1975. Narayan, opposition leaders, and dissenting
members of her own party (the 'Young Turks') were arrested that day.
Jayaprakash Narayan attracted a gathering of
100,000 people at the Ramlila grounds and thunderously recited Rashtrakavi Ramdhari Singh
'Dinkar''s wonderfully evocative poetry: Singhasan Khaali Karo Ke Janata
Aaati Hai.[11]
Narayan was kept as detenu at Chandigarh even
after he asked for one month parole to mobilise relief in flooded parts of Bihar . His health suddenly deteriorated on 24 October,
and he was released on 12 November; diagnosis at Jaslok
Hospital , Bombay , revealed kidney failure; he would be
on dialysis for the rest of his life.
In the
Social
media must regulate itself: Inciting violence, a misuse, should be checked
Misuse
of social media to spread social enmity and incite violence should be back on
the public agenda, following the toxic outbreak on social media following the
Dadri lynching. From urging death to cow killers to calling the media riot
mongers, various social media handles have been spreading objectionable
material on the web, with impunity. Does such impunity merit being tolerated in
the name of freedom of expression? It does not. Freedom of expression does not
run to inciting violence and hate speech, particularly on volatile occasions
such as a riot or a lynching. The only question is what shape the regulation
should take. And any regulation would be superior to the mass blocking of
mobile broadband that the authorities resort to on such occasions. In print, things are
relatively straightforward. The publisher bears responsibility for material
carried in the publication, as choice is exercised in deciding what goes into
print. On social media, where publication is instantaneous and by the user, is
it fair to expect the social media platform to vet every post or message before
it is published? While Facebook does exclude adult material, thus exercising
some regulation of its own, it is neither feasible nor desirable for any social
media platform to exercise judgement as to the acceptability of certain views.
However, social media platforms must be required to do two things. Overt
incitement to violence should be removed instantly and other material objected
to must be subjected to a swift review by internal and external bodies on the
basis of commonly worked out industry guidelines. Social media must institute a
mechanism to act on objections brought to their notice, without waiting for an
official directive. There is no call for state censorship.
Further, they must be
able to trace the creators of social media identities used to spread hatred, or
defame a commercial rival, for that matter. So, even as those desiring anonymity
are not denied, those who carry out mischief while hiding their face from the
public must be identifiable to the social media platform, for warning,
disqualification or prosecution, as required.
Narendra
Modi on the Role of NDTV during the 2002 Riots
Thus far people have heard what media stalwarts have to say about
Narendra Modi. Now hear what Modi has to say about some of the famous media
persons’ coverage of the 2002 riots in Gujarat : To
quote Modi:
(Click for Video: NDTV Role in Adding Fuel to the Fire During
2002 Riots).
It was my endeavour that
we restore peace at the earliest possible. If you look at the data you will see
that in 72 hours we had put down the riots and brought the situation under
control. But these TV channels kept on playing up the same incidents over and
over again. At the time, Rajdeep and Barkha were in the same channel NDTV.
During those inflamed days, Barkha acted in the most irresponsible manner. Surat had not witnessed
any communal killings, barring a few small incidents of clashes. However the
bazaars were closed [as a precautionary measure]. Barkha stood amidst closed
shops screaming “This is Surat ’s
diamond market, but there is not a single police man here.”
I phoned Barkha and said,
“Are you providing the address of this “unprotected” bazaar to the rioting
mobs? Are you inviting them to come and create trouble there by announcing that
there is no police here so you can run amok safely?”
In
a second incident in Anjar, she played up the news that a Hanuman mandir had
been broken and vandalized. I told her, “What are you up to? You are in Kutch which is a border district. There you are showing
the attack and destruction of a mandir. Do you realize the implications of
broadcasting such news? We haven’t yet recovered from the earthquake. Have you
actually done proper investigation into the riots? Why are you lighting fires
for us? Your news takes a few minutes to broadcast that such and such place is
unprotected or a mandir has been vandalized. But it takes for me a few hours to
move the police from one disturbed location to another since these incidents
are breaking out in the most unexpected places.”
What
is worse, when I got the matter enquired into by the local police, we found out
that it was a small, insignificant structure under a tree which had been
damaged a little bit by some crazy individual. But NDTV presented it as an
attack on a Hanuman mandir. When the fires were raging these journalists were
pouring fuel on those fires.
On
that day I had put a ban on TV channels because they were actually provoking
trouble. But it was only for one day.
Since Rajdeep Sardesai was among the leading reporters covering the disturbances, I phoned him to say, “I will have to put a temporary ban on your channel if you continue with the provocative coverage. There is a well-established regulation that media should not name communities during communal riots nor identify a damaged placed as a mandir or masjid. Why are you violating that code and well set protocol about not naming communities or identifying places, of worship? You are going against established norms.”
How Modi Reached the Point of No Return with NDTV?
Modi told me the last straw for him with regard to NDTV was when one of
their correspondents Vijay Trivedi, accompanied him in a helicopter for an
interview. When he started asking the same old insulting questions, Modi simply
kept quiet and refused to respond any further. Piqued at being ignored, Trivedi
spread the canard that Modi nearly threw him out of the helicopter mid-air
because he had asked “tough questions”. Modi says on that day he decided
never to give legitimacy to NDTV by giving them an interview
or
responding to any questions from them. Vijay Trivedi treats this incident as a
badge of honour and has boasted about it on numerous occasions--in writing.
.........
This translation from Hindi is not verbatim but I have tried to be
as close to the meaning of the Hindi oroginal as possible. For a more detailed
account of media's role during the 2002 riots read' "Modi, Muslims and
Media".
.........
Posted on April 8, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment